|
The provision of Art. of the Tax Ordinance states that: A member of the taxpayer's family is jointly and severally liable with all his assets with Therefore, there is no doubt that the regulation in question is exceptional. Third parties are liable for someone else's debt, but this liability may only result from a specific provision of the Act, and these persons only include the entities listed in Art. - of the Act of August , - Tax Ordinance consolidated tJournal of Laws of item . The list of third parties liable for other people's tax arrears is closed. It should be of of the Labor Code concerns providing the employee with free time in a specific part of the week, regardless of whether this free time coincides with of Art. § point of the Labor Code.
The above regulation obliges the employer to plan working time in such a way that each employee has at least one Sunday off in a period of weeks. This obligation is absolute, which means that it cannot be phone number list waived based on the employee's consent or written request. More importantly, the working time schedule cannot be structured in such a way that the employee works on more than three consecutive Sundays e.g. it will be unacceptable to plan.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5aa0/e5aa03131142993e0d19fe3ff837003059fe6ae2" alt=""
Work in such a way that the employee works on six consecutive Sundays and then has two Sundays off . It is also worth noting that the provision of Art. of the Labor Code, which is an exception to the rule expressed in Art. of the Labor Code introduces a system of weekend work, which may be performed on Fridays and Saturdays, as well as Sundays and holidays. This work system can be used regardless of the type of work cf. art. point of the Labor Code . Then the employer is not obliged to grant the employee a Sunday off from work cf. art. of the Labor Code.
|
|