Discuz! Board

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 2|回復: 0

The evidence points definitively

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

1

帖子

5

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

積分
5
發表於 2024-3-12 16:36:11 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
Patent trolls bank that in some cases companies will settle rather than pay the time and monetary costs of fighting infringement lawsuits. In others cases patent trolls seek sympathetic judges who will rule in their favor. Patent trolls are exploiting inefficiencies in the legal system regarding how we define and enforce intellectual property rights. Add to those inefficiencies the fact that patents are not like other kinds of property where ownership is clear cut.

Unlike tangible property like a farm where I can say I legally own this land and you are planting on it the intellectual property space is relatively amorphous. It can be hard to tell whether you are infringing on my intellectual property or not. Congress has found it hard to act on the patent troll issue. To date twelve pieces of legislation have been proposed to clamp Chinese Overseas America Number Data down on NPEs but none have passed—in part because no one knows how many NPE lawsuits are genuine and how many represent trolling. To understand the behavior and impact of non practicing entities Cohen Gurun and Kominers used a database of NPEs and of their subsidiaries. The researchers found some court cases in which NPEs sued for patent infringement. In of those cases the defendants were publicly traded—so the researchers were able to determine whether the lawsuits looked legitimate or more like mere money grabs. troll ward. The biggest predictor of whether you will be sued is whether you have a lot of cash or just came into an increase of cash says Cohen.





It looks overwhelmingly like NPEs are just targeting firms that are more likely to pay out. In fact the researchers found that for every billion or so in cash holdings a company was six times more likely to be sued by an NPE. Furthermore they found that NPEs tend to go after firms that have small legal teams or those engaged in other non IP related litigation—perhaps hoping for easy settlements. If NPEs really thought they had a great case as stewards of intellectual property it wouldn t matter how many lawyers a target company had argues Cohen.

回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|自動贊助|GameHost抗攻擊論壇

GMT+8, 2025-4-22 06:47 , Processed in 0.066249 second(s), 18 queries .

抗攻擊 by GameHost X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
一粒米 | 中興米 | 論壇美工 | 設計 抗ddos | 天堂私服 | ddos | ddos | 防ddos | 防禦ddos | 防ddos主機 | 天堂美工 | 設計 防ddos主機 | 抗ddos主機 | 抗ddos | 抗ddos主機 | 抗攻擊論壇 | 天堂自動贊助 | 免費論壇 | 天堂私服 | 天堂123 | 台南清潔 | 天堂 | 天堂私服 | 免費論壇申請 | 抗ddos | 虛擬主機 | 實體主機 | vps | 網域註冊 | 抗攻擊遊戲主機 | ddos |